Key Takeaways

  • Most postings describe an ideal, and the person hired rarely meets every stated item.
  • Required and preferred are different lists, and conflating them stops qualified people applying.
  • Some gaps are absolute — licences, clearances, work authorisation — and no framing substitutes.
  • Address the gap directly rather than hoping it goes unnoticed.
  • Meeting most required items is the normal condition of a successful application.

Which gaps actually matter

Sorting the real barriers from the soft ones.

Hard credentials are absolute. A required licence, registration, security clearance, professional qualification or right to work is a gate rather than a preference, and applying without one wastes everyone's time.

Core technical requirements are usually real. If the role is fundamentally about a specific system and you have never used it, that is a genuine gap rather than a framing problem.

Years of experience are soft in most private sector hiring. A candidate one or two years under a stated figure is routinely considered when the rest is strong.

Preferred items are tie-breakers, used to separate otherwise equal candidates, and missing several of them costs you very little.

Adjacent experience frequently substitutes. A comparable tool, the same problem in another industry or a related regulation usually satisfies the underlying need.

And soft requirements are almost never checked — the stakeholder management, the fast-paced environment, the excellent communication. Everyone claims these and nobody screens on them.

The rough threshold

How much of the list you need.

You meet Verdict
All required items Apply, and expect to be competitive
Most required items Apply; this is the normal case
About half Apply only if something else is exceptional
Under half Your effort belongs on a better match
Missing a hard credential Do not apply

Count only the required list for this calculation and ignore preferred items entirely, which is the single adjustment that changes most people's behaviour.

Waiting for a complete match means applying to almost nothing, and the candidates who get hired are frequently the ones who applied at seventy per cent.

But a weak match is not free. Applications consume time that proper tailoring on a genuine fit requires, so the threshold protects your effort rather than your ego.

Addressing the gap in writing

Where to say it and how much space to give it.

The cover letter is the right place when one is expected, in a single sentence near the end rather than in the opening.

One sentence is the correct length. A paragraph of explanation makes the gap look larger than it is and shifts the letter's emphasis onto your weakness.

Name the equivalent immediately after. The structure is simple — I have not worked with X, though I have done the same work in Y for three years.

Do not apologise. An apologetic tone converts a manageable gap into a reason for doubt.

Never raise it in the resume itself. The resume states what you have done; the gap belongs in the letter or in conversation, not as a negative line on the document.

And skip it entirely for minor preferred items, since drawing attention to a gap nobody would have screened on creates a problem where none existed.

Building the missing piece

Closing a gap rather than framing it.

Short courses and certifications work for tool-specific gaps and are frequently completable in weeks rather than months.

A personal project demonstrates a tool more convincingly than a certificate, because it shows the work rather than the attendance.

Volunteering provides genuine experience in areas where paid opportunities are closed to you without the experience.

Internal moves are the fastest route, since acquiring a skill in your current job carries no application risk at all.

Contract or freelance work builds evidence quickly and is frequently available at a level below what permanent roles demand.

And documenting what you learn matters as much as learning it, because an undocumented skill is invisible on a resume and unverifiable at interview.

Six weeks of deliberate work closes many gaps that feel permanent, which is worth remembering before writing off a role you want.

Mini checklist

  • unchecked: Required and preferred lists separated
  • unchecked: Hard credentials checked honestly
  • unchecked: Adjacent experience identified for each gap
  • unchecked: Proportion of required items counted
  • unchecked: Gap addressed directly in the application
  • unchecked: Evidence prepared for the closest equivalent
  • unchecked: Effort matched to the quality of the fit

Scenarios

Scenario 1: You meet everything except the years of experience

Apply. This is the most common and most survivable gap, and a strong recent record usually outweighs a shortfall of a year or two.

Scenario 2: You have used a comparable tool but not the one named

Apply, and name the equivalence explicitly. Someone who has done the work in a similar system learns the named one quickly, and saying so directly is far better than leaving the reader to infer it.

Scenario 3: The role requires a licence you do not hold

Do not apply unless you are in the process of obtaining it, in which case say so with a date. This category is genuinely absolute.

Tip: Address the largest gap in one sentence rather than hoping it is overlooked. A reader who spots an unacknowledged gap assumes you did not notice it; a reader who sees it named assumes you have thought about it.

Do's and Don'ts

Do

  • Count only the required items
  • Name adjacent experience explicitly
  • Address the biggest gap directly
  • Apply at around seventy per cent match
  • Check hard credentials honestly
  • Concentrate effort on genuine fits

Don't

  • Treat preferred items as mandatory
  • Apply without a required licence
  • Hope an obvious gap is missed
  • Claim experience you do not have
  • Wait for a complete match
  • Spend equal effort on weak matches

Common Mistakes

  • Counting preferred items. It disqualifies people who would have competed well.
  • Ignoring hard credentials. These are gates, not preferences.
  • Concealing the gap. It reads as not having noticed.
  • Overclaiming instead. It fails at interview and costs more.
  • Waiting for a perfect match. It means applying to almost nothing.
  • Applying to everything. It crowds out the applications that could work.

Keep building on this with the related guides in this series:

You can also check your resume's ATS score for free, generate a tailored cover letter, or build a portfolio website in minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I apply if I do not meet every requirement?

Usually yes. Count only the required items, ignore the preferred list, and apply if you meet most of them. Postings describe an ideal candidate who rarely exists.

Which requirements are genuinely absolute?

Licences, professional registrations, security clearances and the right to work. No amount of adjacent experience or good framing substitutes for these.

How much of the list do I need?

Around seventy per cent of the required items is the normal condition of a successful application. Below half, your effort is better spent on a stronger match.

Should I mention the gap?

Yes, in one sentence. An unacknowledged gap reads as an oversight, while a named one reads as self-awareness and invites the reader to weigh it fairly.

Does adjacent experience count?

Frequently. A comparable tool or the same problem in a different industry usually satisfies the underlying requirement, provided you state the equivalence explicitly.

Do years of experience matter exactly?

Rarely in private sector hiring, where a year or two under the stated figure is routinely considered. In public sector and regulated roles the number is far more often a hard gate.

Where should I mention a gap in my application?

In the cover letter, in one sentence near the end, immediately followed by the closest equivalent experience. Never as a negative line on the resume itself, and never with an apology.

How do I close a missing skill gap?

Short courses for tool-specific gaps, a personal project to demonstrate real use, volunteering, an internal move at your current employer, or contract work. Document what you learn or it stays invisible.

Free · No account needed

What is your resume scoring right now?

Scan it against a job description and get your ATS match score in about a minute.

Drop your resume here or choose a file

PDF only. Max 2 MB.

We never share your data or use it to train AI models.

TailorCV ATS scorecard showing an overall score with per-section checks passed and failed
What you get back: an overall score plus every check that passed or failed, section by section.

Was this guide useful?

Be the first to rate it.